Drawing for CAREDX

USPTO serial 86975205

CAREDX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAREDX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hollis Beth Hire

HOLLIS BETH HIRE WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044testing for scientific research purposes, namely, donor-specific cell-free DNA testing in analysis of gene expression, inflammatory, cardiovascular diseases and disorders and organ transplant rejection or tolerance; testing for scientific research purposes, namely, blood-based testing to determine immune response and organ transplant rejection or toleranceACTIVEMar 28, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 29, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 28, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2015AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2015IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 27, 2015AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 12, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2014EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 17, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance