USPTO serial 86977464
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KANSAS CITY, MO
KANSAS CITY, MO
KANSAS CITY, MO
Kansas City, MO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Paskar
MARK A. PASKAR BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102-2711UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Agricultural business management services, namely, data compilation and analysis for use in crop planning, monitoring and management and assessing harvest yield annual performance benchmarks, actual harvest yields and harvest yield performance variance between benchmarks and actual harvest yields; provision of an online computer database in the fields of crop planning, crop monitoring, crop management and agricultural performance data and information and for assessing harvest yield annual performance benchmarks, actual harvest yields and harvest yield performance variance between benchmarks and actual harvest yields, all the foregoing for business purposes; provision of statistical business harvest yield data and statistical business agricultural machine operation and performance data via global computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2010 |
| 042 | Agricultural research, testing and data analysis in the fields of crop planning, crop monitoring, crop management, agricultural machine operation and performance and for assessing harvest yield annual performance benchmarks, actual harvest yields and harvest yield performance variance between benchmarks and actual harvest yields; provision of an online computer database in the fields of crop planning, crop monitoring, crop management and agricultural performance data and information and for assessing harvest yield annual performance benchmarks, actual harvest yields and harvest yield performance variance between benchmarks and actual harvest yields, all the foregoing for technical analysis purposes; provision of technical harvest yield data and technical agricultural machine operation and performance data, via global computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2010 |
| 044 | Provision of an online computer database in the fields of crop planning, crop monitoring, crop management and agricultural performance data and information and for assessing harvest yield annual performance benchmarks, actual harvest yields and harvest yield performance variance between benchmarks and actual harvest yields, all the foregoing for agricultural purposes; online provision of agricultural harvest yield data and agricultural machine operation and performance data, all for agricultural purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |