USPTO serial 87006896
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J SALVATORE
MICHAEL J SALVATORE Holmes Weinberg, PC30765 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 41130765 Pacific Coast HighwayMalibu, CA 90265| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising and marketing; publicity and promotional services; artist management, namely, management of performing and recording artists; promoting the concerts of others; promoting the parties and special events of others; business management services; online retail store services featuring books, clothing used to promote performing and recording artists and dancers, music, videos, and dance accessories; business advice and information; marketing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR POSTING AND VIEWING VIDEOS, SENDING AND RECEIVING MESSAGES AND POSTING COMMENTS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES FOR PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR UPLOADING AUDIOVISUAL CONTENT AND PLAYING GAMES IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | licensing of intellectual property; providing information about fashion used to promote performing and recording artists and dancers; information services, namely, providing fashion information, providing information about fashion used to promote performing and recording artists and dancers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |