USPTO serial 87027706
INNOVATING AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2021
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INNOVATING AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neuhausen, DE
Neuhausen, DE
Neuhausen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas M. McAllister
Douglas M. McAllister LIPSITZ & MCALLISTER, LLC755 MAIN STREET, BUILDING 8MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical sensors; electric position switches; electric multiple limit switches; electric switches, namely, electric inductive, optoelectronic, capacitive, and magnetic field dependent proximity switches; rotational transmitters, namely, sensors for detecting rotation and rotational angle and transmitting corresponding electronic signals; path transducers, namely, electroacoustic transducers, inductive transducers, optoelectronic transducers, capacitive transducers, and magnetic field dependent transducers; electrical, optical and RFID sensors for determining position, distance, path, angle, velocity, angular velocity, acceleration, and presence and non-presence of objects adapted to be connected to an electrical bus; signal evaluation sensors and electronic circuits, in particular for measuring position, path, rotational speed, angular position, velocity, acceleration, and time; interface converters between electrical buses, and between sensors, transmitters and commutators; path measuring systems comprising electric sensors and transmitters coupled to the sensors; electric precision switches; electromechanical switch elements and parts thereof; detection elements and detector bodies for sensors and commutators, namely, sequence signal cams, and sequence signal cams in the form of a strip or a rack; couplers and connectors for electrical cables; couplers and connectors for electrical circuits; ultrasonic and ultrasound sensors for determining position, distance, path, angle, velocity, angular velocity, acceleration, and presence and non-presence of objects, not for medical purposes; shaft encoders; incremental, absolute and multi-turn encoders; electronic identification systems comprising optical sensors, barcode readers, RFID sensors, and parts thereof; RFID and optical based identification systems comprising optical sensors, RFID sensors, and parts thereof; field bus systems comprising fieldbus trunk wires, fieldbus interfaces, junction boxes, electrical controllers, device couplers, sensor communication hubs, and electrical actor communication hubs; ethernet based fieldbus systems comprising fieldbus trunk wires, fieldbus interfaces, junction boxes, ethernet controllers, device couplers, sensor communication hubs, and electrical fieldbus actor communication hubs; electrical, optical and RFID wireless linked sensors and electronic communication systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data; digital electronic fieldbus communication systems comprising sensors, transmitters, electrical fieldbus actors, and communication hubs; electric sensors and electric switches for safety purposes, namely, electric position switches, electric multiple limit switches, electric inductive, optoelectronic, capacitive, and magnetic field dependent proximity switches, and path measuring sensors for determining position, distance, path, angle, velocity, angular velocity, acceleration, and presence and non-presence of objects; optical industrial cameras, lights for optical industrial cameras | ACTIVE | Aug 4, 2020 |
| 042 | Advisory services and consultancy services in the field of industrial engineering; consultancy and information services in the field of the design of sensors, switches, electrical fieldbus actors, communication systems, optical camera systems, RFID and optical identification systems; design and development in the field of sensors, switches, electrical fieldbus actors, communication systems, optical camera systems, RFID and optical identification systems; engineering services in the field of sensors, switches, electrical fieldbus actors, communication systems, vision systems, identification systems; local area network and machine tool telecommunication network design in the fields of sensors, switches, electrical fieldbus actors, communication systems, optical camera systems, RFID and optical identification systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |