Drawing for DN

USPTO serial 87040639

DN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, IN PYO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D. ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) featuring business management and performance software for commodity driven businesses by means of providing forecasts, simulations, analysis and prescriptive analytics of data and trends; Technical support services, namely, customization and optimization of computer software platforms for business and management of commodity driven businesses by means of providing forecasts, simulations, analysis and prescriptive analytics of data and trendsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 22, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 5, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 27, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance