USPTO serial 87046562
JIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jami A. Gekas
JAMI A. GEKAS FOLEY & LARDNER LLP321 NORTH CLARK STREETSUITE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60654-5313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for use in apparel and accessories to detect, sense, store, report, monitor, upload, and download data, signals, images, sounds, and GPS coordinates to devices through electronic and mobile communication networks; wearable digital electronic devices for detecting, sensing, storing, reporting, monitoring, uploading and downloading data to digital assistants, smart phones, and personal computers; motion sensors in the nature of wearable activity trackers; pedometers; electronic sensors used for geographic locating and motion detection intended for incorporation into apparel and accessories; electric or electronic sensors for geographic locating and motion detection; downloadable software for geographic locating and motion detection; wireless communication devices for voice, data, or image transmission; wearable computer peripherals; wearable computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Garments and clothing incorporated with wearable digital electronic devices and sensors, namely, shirts, t-shirts, jackets, pants, track pants, shorts, belts, shoes, footwear, socks, hats, athletic tops and bottoms, sports tops and bottoms, jerseys, undershirts, undergarments, sweatbands, windcheaters, swimwear, sweatshirts, and sweaters; garments and clothing with integrated wearable digital technology, namely, shirts, t-shirts, jackets, pants, track pants, shorts, belts, shoes, footwear, socks, hats, athletic tops and bottoms, sports tops and bottoms, jerseys, undershirts, undergarments, sweatbands, windcheaters, swimwear, sweatshirts, and sweaters; garments and clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, jackets, pants, track pants, shorts, sports bottoms, belts, shoes, footwear, socks, hats, athletic tops and bottoms, sports tops, windcheaters, jerseys, sweatshirts, swimwear, undershirts, undergarments, sweatbands and sweaters | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing data and analytical information in the field of wearable technological products and electronic devices used for geographic locating and motion detection | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website for parents featuring non-downloadable software that enables geographic locating and motion detection of children; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for geographic locating and motion detection of children; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for geographic locating and motion detection; none of the foregoing for use by healthcare or wellness professionals, consultants, employees and/or patients on or in connection with healthcare, wellness, healthcare or wellness management, education, and/or the storage, maintenance, updating, management or modification of healthcare or wellness data, educational materials, information or documents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |