USPTO serial 87058284
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wolfville, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H. Bora
ROGER H. BORA THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 INNOVATION DRIVE, SUITE 400DAYTON, OH 45342UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Use in Commerce) Foot deodorant sprays; body sprays used as a personal deodorant; (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) non-mediated skin care preparations, namely, body mists and skin toners; air fresheners, namely, air fragrances preparations for household use; air fresheners, namely, air fragrancing preparations | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2016 |
| 005 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Air fresheners, namely, air deodorizing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |