Drawing for OAKVILLE WINERY

USPTO serial 87083151

OAKVILLE WINERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OAKVILLE WINERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J SCOTT GERIEN DIKENSON PEATMAN & FOGARTY1455 FIRST STREETSUITE 301NAPA, CA 94559

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, except beerACTIVEFeb 15, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 12, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 12, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 11, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Oct 9, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 9, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 9, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 19, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 19, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 25, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance