CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SQUAWK

USPTO serial 87085171

SQUAWK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQUAWK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andy I. Corea

ANDY I. COREA MURTHA CULLINA265 CHURCH STREETONE CENTURY TOWERNEW HAVEN, CT 06510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Internet of Things-based computer software applications for mobile phones, tablets, portable media players and computers, for sending alert notifications resulting from anomalies detected by home sensors to designated contacts, namely, homeowners, insurance companies and repair and maintenance vendors and specialists through voice, SMS, e-mail and social media channels, in order to facilitate repairs and expedited insurance claimsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 5, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 4, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 4, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 4, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 28, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 21, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 21, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 26, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 26, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance