USPTO serial 87109138
OPTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2019
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with OPTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Québec, Québec, CA
Québec, Québec, CA
Québec, Québec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allison Strickland Ricketts
Allison Strickland Ricketts FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 W. 42nd Street, 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Packaging line inspection machines; downloadable computer software and downloadable cloud-based software for serialization, namely the application of serial numbers or codes to products and logging and storage of such numbers to enable product tracking through the entire supply chain | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ Manufacture of packaging line inspection machines ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software consulting services and advice in the field of packaging and serialization of products to assist others with achieving compliance with product tracking system requirements; mechanical engineering; software engineering; computer software project management services; computer project management services in the field of packaging and serialization of products to assist others with achieving compliance with product tracking system requirements; computer systems integration services; technical support services in the form of troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with packaging line inspection machines and computer software problems; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware in the field of packaging and serialization of products to assist others with achieving compliance with product tracking system requirements; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for serialization, namely, the application of serial numbers or codes to products and logging and storage of such numbers to enable product tracking through the entire supply chain | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTEL VISION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTEL VISION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTEL VISION INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 28, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |