Drawing for PRACTICELINK

USPTO serial 87126279

PRACTICELINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5541581Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2018
Examiner
KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with PRACTICELINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth H. Alter

Beth H. Alter Seward & Kissel LLPOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for business process management for lawyers, legal service providers, corporate legal departments, and legal consulting firms; software for workflow and process automation for legal services; software for processing documents and data, aggregating business information related to legal services across data sources and task management; software for data review, process management and user task assignment in the field of law or legal industry; software for legal service process management, namely, to deliver efficiency, agility, and control in a manner that enables businesses to achieve a greater level of performance and value through process differentiation; software used to develop, link, and integrate software components in client/server or global computer network environments for legal practice managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 10, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2024PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 19, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 14, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 11, 2018SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 13, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 5, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance