USPTO serial 87126412
INTELLITRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANESH, HARINI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLITRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
NAPERVILLE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan W. Richards
JONATHAN W RICHARDS WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE #1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for electronic monitoring services for probation and parole agencies and for security and behavioral and re-socialization purposes, namely, remote monitoring of individuals released on probation or parole, all limited to the fields of probation and parole | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | electronic monitoring services for probation and parole agencies and for security and behavioral and re-socialization purposes, namely, remote monitoring of individuals released on probation or parole, all limited to the fields of probation and parole | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |