Drawing for BETTER LEARNING FROM BETTER LEARNING TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 87153456

BETTER LEARNING FROM BETTER LEARNING TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5198746Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 9, 2017
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with BETTER LEARNING FROM BETTER LEARNING TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew E. Connors

Matthew E. Connors GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business association services, namely, promoting the public awareness for the need for design, development, and dissemination of interoperability specifications, standards, and best practices for products and services in the education and training sectorsACTIVEOct 17, 2014
042Development of voluntary standards for interoperability of information technology for use in the education and training sectorsACTIVEOct 17, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2023NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2023C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 10, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 9, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Sep 3, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance