USPTO serial 87157403
CRASHPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRASHPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY & KELLEY LLP6320 CANOGA AVENUESUITE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line trading services to facilitate the sale of goods and services by others via a computer network and providing evaluative feedback and ratings of sellers' goods and services, the value and prices of sellers' goods and services, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall trading experience in connection therewith; Providing online business directories featuring temporary lodging | ABANDONED | Sep 4, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |