Drawing for HASK

USPTO serial 87178106

HASK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HASK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul C Llewellyn

PAUL C LLEWELLYN ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP250 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-9710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic devices for locating, tracking, and monitoring activity of animals and pets using radio frequency, global positioning systems, cellular communication networks, and motion activity; GPS tracking devices for use in connection with the tracking and locating of pets and animals; Electronic motion and proximity sensors for pets; Electronic pet collars to train animals by monitoring location and activity; electronic pet collars to monitor safety and security by monitoring location and activity; Electronic pet collars used for purposes of safety and security by means of monitoring location and activity and by providing remotely activated light and sound; Electronic pet collars for safety and security by means of remotely activated light and sound used to indicate pet locationACTIVE—
010Electronic pet collar for monitoring health and wellness by means of measuring and tracking physical activity and ambient temperatureACTIVE—
018Collars for animals; dog collarsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 12, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 8, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance