Drawing for HUAWEI

USPTO serial 87234220

HUAWEI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUAWEI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Sloane

Peter Sloane LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) Robots for personal or hobby use; robots for personal use, namely, robots for video and audio monitoring, surveillance, and communication; tactical robots; tactical robot accessories, namely, remote controls, cameras, electronic sensors, batteries, and battery chargers; software and sensors that allow a robotic cleaning device to sense and respond to environmental inputs; computer hardware and software for use in connection with remote controlled land vehicles, namely, automatic guided vehicles, remote controlled all-terrain vehicles, and armored vehicles; computer hardware and software for the control of automatic machines, namely, automatic floor cleaning machines, vacuum cleaners, and industrial robots, in the fields of interior maintenance of households and commercial buildings, law enforcement, scientific research and search and rescue; mobile robotic system comprised primarily of robots, operating software, cameras, communication systems consisting of wireless transmitters and receivers, electric sensors and computers for personal human use; computer hardware and software for use in connection for the control of a robot; mobile phones and communication devices for use with robots; robots for personal, educational and hobby use; replacement parts and structural parts for robots for personal, educational and hobby use; remote controls for vacuum cleaners, automatic floor cleaning machines, home outdoor and lawn care maintenance and industrial robots; robots for personal use, namely, robots that provide cleaning functions for householdsACTIVE—
011(Based on 44(e)) Laundry dryers, electricACTIVE—
012(Based on 44(e)) Electric vehicles, namely, cars; remote control land vehicles, other than toys; snowmobiles; vehicles for locomotion by land, air, water or rail, namely, land vehicles and boats; tramcars; mobility scooters; aerial conveyors; handling carts; air vehicles, namely, planes; space vehicles; military drones; civilian drones; anti-theft devices for vehicles; anti-theft alarms for vehicles; remote controlled land vehicles, namely, automatic guided vehicles; remote controlled all-terrain vehicles; armored vehicles; automated guided land vehicles in the nature of unmanned transportation robots to replace workers and to prevent workspace accidents consisting of a tracked remote controlled automatic guided land vehicles; unmanned vehicles, namely, cars and planes; remote controlled vehicles, namely, cars and planesACTIVE—
028(Based on 44(e)) Toy robots; transforming robotic toys; transforming robotic toy vehicles; motorized toy robots; remote controlled toy robots; radio-controlled toy robots; electric action toys; electric educational toy used to demonstrate alternative energy sources; electric toy train transformers; electronic activity toys, namely, children's multiple activity toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2022FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Sep 10, 2021ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 3, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 15, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 20, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance