USPTO serial 87236427
SOLUTIONS FOR INTELLIGENT LENDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2017
- Examiner
- CHERY, JEFFREY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SOLUTIONS FOR INTELLIGENT LENDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA, US
San Jose, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cook
Thomas W. Cook THOMAS COOK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYSP.O. BOX 1989SAUSALITO, CA 94966UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud-based loan origination software services, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in loan origination and for loan management for use by lenders, available via website and mobile internet browsers; automated decision making services for analyzing and evaluating mortgages, namely, providing software as a service (SAAS) in the financial services industry for evaluating residential mortgages to provide an assessment of credit risk, program eligibility, loan pricing, and approval requirements | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 31, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |