USPTO serial 87258429
STARBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALASHEVICH, JASON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katharyn E. Owen
KATHARYN E OWEN STAR2STAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC600 TALLEVAST RD STE 202SARASOTA, FL 34243UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Downloadable computer application software for desktop computers, tablets, and mobile devices which allows a user to make and receive Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls via a subscription-based unified communications service, and includes presence management tools, voicemail, direct inward dialing, faxing features, and chat features | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2015 |
| 042 | electronic telecommunications data security services offered to third party business entity users as part of unified communications managed services plans, namely, enforcing, restricting, and controlling access privileges of users of telecommunications data based on assigned credentials; end-to-end system telecommunications system monitoring services to ensure the proper functioning of telecommunications systems, offered as part of unified communications managed services plans; technical support and private network operational support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing communications system hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |