USPTO serial 87293411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Thousand Palms, CA, US
Thousand Palms, CA, US
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, ale and lager | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2018 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 3, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |