USPTO serial 87301561
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn Jordan
Lynn Jordan Kelly IP, LLP1300 19th Street, NW, Suite 300Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Product demonstrations provided via communications networks for mobile phones, smart phones, tablet computers, computer and computer software products, entertainment products, tablet computers, handheld mobile digital electronic devices; Providing technical consumer product information relating to consumer electronic products, namely, mobile phones, smart phones, tablet computers, computer and computer software products, entertainment products, tablet computers, handheld mobile digital electronic devices, Providing an interactive web site featuring technical consumer product information about consumer electronic products; Providing technical consumer product information via the internet; Electronic commerce services, namely, providing technical information about products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications connections to computer databases and the internet; Electronic transmission of streamed and downloadable audio and video files via computer and other communications networks excluding music recordings; Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; Provision of telecommunications connections to electronic communications networks, for transmission or reception of audio, video or multimedia content excluding music recordings; Online radio streaming services, namely, streaming audio material via the Internet excluding music recordings; Wireless broadcasting services, namely, transmitting and streaming digital audio, video, graphics, voice data images, signals, text via the internet, portable and wireless communication devices excluding music recordings; Providing an online community, namely, providing access to databases and transmission and streaming of digital audio, video, graphics, text and data on internet service enabling transmission and streaming of digital audio, video, graphics, text and data excluding music recordings; Providing internet chat rooms excluding music recording topics; Internet, television and radio broadcasting services excluding broadcasting music recordings; Streaming of data excluding streaming of music recordings; Webcasting services excluding webcasting music recordings; Providing multiple user wireless access to the internet or user access to a global computer network to enable users to access non-musical audio and video content, data and information provided by means of wired or wireless broadcast, digital broadcast or electronic transmission; Providing third party users with wireless access to telecommunication infrastructure to enable users to access non-musical audio and video content, data and information provided by means of wired or wireless broadcast, digital broadcast or electronic transmission; Interactive delivery of non-musical audio and audiovisual contents over digital networks; Computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest (chat rooms) excluding music recording topics; Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of virtual reality content and data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |