USPTO serial 87314647
INFINEAPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINEAPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R Gilman
Michael R Gilman KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARZ LLP90 Matawan Rd., Suite 201Matawan, NJ 07747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile payment application software for making mobile payments, for transferring mobile payments, for keeping track of and documenting mobile payments, and for communicating mobile payments, all via smart phones; payment application software in the nature of computer application software for making mobile payments, for transferring mobile payments, for keeping track of and documenting mobile payments, and for communicating mobile payments, all via mobile phones; computer software for smart phones and mobile phones, namely, software for processing electronic payments, for transferring funds to and from others, and for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information and transaction and payment information; computer application programs for mobile phones for processing electronic payments, for transferring funds to and from others, and for transmitting, processing, facilitating, verifying, and authenticating credit and debit card information and transaction and payment information; Computer application software for mobile phones, smart phones and tablets, namely, software for making mobile payments, software for transferring mobile payments, software for keeping track of and documenting mobile payments, and software for communicating mobile payments; Mobile application software for mobile phones, smart phones and tablets, namely, software used to make financial payments and transactions; Computer application software for smartphones, namely, software for making credit card mobile payments, software for transferring credit card mobile payments, software for keeping track of and documenting credit card mobile payments, and software for communicating credit card mobile payments | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Providing electronic mobile bill payment services for others; mobile and internet payment services, namely, processing electronic funds transfer via mobile computing in the nature of electronic funds transfer by wireless data networks; mobile internet payment services, namely, mobile electronic bill payment services over the internet; integrated services of mobile electronic wallet and mobile payment, namely, electronic transfer of funds and processing electronic funds transfer via mobile computing devices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2021 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |