USPTO serial 87351674
LA CHULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2018
- Examiner
- BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with LA CHULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
La Libertad, SV
La Libertad, SV
La Libertad, SV
Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
La Libertad, SV
Other trademarks owned by Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
La Libertad, SV
Other trademarks owned by Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
La Libertad, SV
Other trademarks owned by Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON STREETSUITE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | preserved, frozen, dried, and cooked fruits | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daboub, Rolando Javier Siman
- Other trademarks owned by Daboub, Rolando Javier Siman
- Other trademarks owned by Daboub, Rolando Javier Siman
- Other trademarks owned by Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
- Other trademarks owned by Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
- Other trademarks owned by Giner, Ricardo Ramón Ernesto González
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named LA CHULA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |