Drawing for ARMORLUBE

USPTO serial 87383562

ARMORLUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARMORLUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Quan Nguyen

QUAN NGUYEN NGUYEN AND TARBET, LLC4199 CAMPUS DR., STE 550IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Protective and lubricating coatings for firearms; Protective and lubricating coatings for gearsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 10, 2018SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
May 9, 2018PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 9, 2018CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 8, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 7, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 17, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 17, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance