Drawing for THE DEAN COLLECTION

USPTO serial 87386628

THE DEAN COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DEAN COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zeynel Karcioglu

Zeynel Karcioglu JACOBS & BURLEIGH LLP1270 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 7TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable computer software for permitting the purchase and sale of art, clothing, and fashion accessoriesACTIVE—
016Fine art, namely, paintings, art prints; framed art pictures and prints; paintings and their reproductions; graphic art prints; graphic art reproductions; graphic fine art printsACTIVEAug 1, 2016
035organizing and conducting fashion shows for commercial purposesACTIVE—
041organizing and conducting fashion shows for entertainment purposesACTIVE—
042providing a website featuring online non-downloadable web-based software applications for permitting the purchase and sale of art, clothing, and fashion accessories; providing on-line non-downloadable web-based software applications for permitting the purchase and sale of art, clothing, and fashion accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2019GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2019INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2019EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 1, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance