Drawing for INDUSTRY 4.0 THINKTANK

USPTO serial 87406723

INDUSTRY 4.0 THINKTANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AVENT, TEAGUE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INDUSTRY 4.0 THINKTANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison Strickland Ricketts

ALLISON STRICKLAND RICKETTS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training in the field of digitalization of products manufacturing; organization of educational presentations and conferences in the field of digitalization of products manufacturingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 23, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance