USPTO serial 87442597
HIFUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIFUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69120 VAULX-EN-VELIN, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn M. Passen
CAROLYN M. PASSEN KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN, LLP525 WEST MONROE STREETCHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE, ALGORITHM, AND DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING MEDICAL APPARATUS IN THE FIELD OF UROLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND MEDICAL DATA ANALYSIS; COMPUTERS TO BE USED WITH APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL USE; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES, namely, ECHOGRAPHIC DISPLAY APPARATUS, MRI, X-RAY AND PET SCAN AND OBSERVATIONS INSTRUMENTS AS MICROSCOPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, MINIMALLY-INVASIVE MEDICAL DEVICES FOR UROLOGY USING ULTRASOUND TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS USING A HIGH-INTENSITY CONVERGENT BEAM OF ULTRASOUND PRODUCED BY HIGH-POWER SENSORS; X-RAY PHOTOGRAPHS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; APPARATUS FOR RADIOLOGY FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; PROBES FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; UROLOGICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, UROLOGICAL IMAGING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |