Drawing for OVME

USPTO serial 87510917

OVME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OVME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Tucker Barr

J. TUCKER BARR ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP171 17TH STREET NWSUITE 2100ATLANTA, GA 30363

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated creams for skin care; non-medicated lotions for skin care; non-medicated gels for skin care; non-medicated powders for skin care; non-medicated sun care preparations; hair cleansing preparations; hair care preparations; essential oils for personal useACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing audio and video conferencing services for providing consumers with access to healthcare consultations with healthcare professionalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 10, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2018UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
Jul 9, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 4, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 4, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance