USPTO serial 87544912
PNEUGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PNEUGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winston-Salem, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Shin
JOSEPH SHIN NK PATENT LAW, PLLC4917 WATERS EDGE DRIVESUITE 275RALEIGH, NC 27606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Biopsy instruments for use in outpatient urological core-needle biopsies; Medical specimen collection devices in the nature of multi-chambered containers for the collection of biopsy samples in outpatient urological core-needle biopsies; Medical instruments for use in performing outpatient urological core-needle biopsies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |