Drawing for NO BAD STUFF (NO KIDDING)

USPTO serial 87569007

NO BAD STUFF (NO KIDDING)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABLE, ERIC
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO BAD STUFF (NO KIDDING)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN M. HOFFBERG

STEVEN M. HOFFBERG HOFFBERG & ASSOCIATES29 Buckout RoadSuite 101West Harrison, NY 10604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit-based raw food bars; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut- and dried fruit- based snack bars; Nut-based food bars; Nut-based snack bars; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Processed fruit- and nut-based food bars; Seed-based snack bars; Vegetable-based raw food barsACTIVEFeb 1, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 14, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 28, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 6, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 6, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 6, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 6, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance