USPTO serial 87593820
JUSTIN GYPSY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2021
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with JUSTIN GYPSY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Chen
David Chen IP ATTORNEYS GROUP LLC16 OXFORD ROADMILFORD, CT 06460UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Headwear | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boot Royalty Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Boot Royalty Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Boot Royalty Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named JUSTIN GYPSY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |