Drawing for AUTO SHACK

USPTO serial 87600366

AUTO SHACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTO SHACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Homyk

Matthew A. Homyk BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand-operated automotive repair tools, namely, brake pad spreaders; Hand-operated automotive repair tools, namely, disc brake piston cubes; Hand-operated automotive repair tools, namely, valve spring compressorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2020MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2020ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Dec 10, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 19, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 12, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 26, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 24, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 21, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance