Drawing for THE KITCHEN

USPTO serial 87636138

THE KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Passarelli

CHRISTOPHER J PASSARELLI DICKENSON PEATMAN & FOGARTY1455 FIRST ST STE 301NAPA, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVESep 30, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 25, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 22, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 14, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Sep 16, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 28, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 28, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 28, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 23, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 23, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance