USPTO serial 87645393
BE GREAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BE GREAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ghet-O-Vision Entertainment LLC
244 Fifth Avenue #2660, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine C. Washington, Esq.
CHRISTINE C WASHINGTON244 FIFTH AVENUE2660NEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of music, film, television, live recorded and online programming, concerts and special events, blogs, online commentary and journalistic works, non-downloadable files, streamed transmissions, websites and webcasts about current trends and topics in entertainment and popular culture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |