Drawing for BREAKBULKBOXX

USPTO serial 87722327

BREAKBULKBOXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREAKBULKBOXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY1497 CHAIN BRIDGE ROADSUITE 204MCLEAN, VA 22101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal shipping containers for the transportation of goods; intermodal metal shipping containers for the transportation of goodsACTIVESep 26, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 23, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2019IIOAINADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION—
Apr 25, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Apr 25, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 25, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 28, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 24, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance