USPTO serial 87727989
GOZO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOZO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAIPEI CITY 11492, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Wallets; purses; pocket wallets; backpacks; school bags; waist bags; carrying bags; shopping bags; net bags for shopping; luggage; key cases; cosmetic bag; handbags; travelling bags; business card holders in the nature of wallets; holders for Identity Cards; rucksacks; business card cases; haversacks; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Sweaters; shirts; T-shirts; suit; dress; skirts; trousers; articles of clothing made of down feather; topcoats; coats; jackets; ponchos; articles of clothing made of leather; articles of clothing made of imitation leather; apparel; articles of clothing made of denims; clothing; women's shoes; shoes; sandals; shoes made of cloth; leather shoes; boots; scarfs; neckerchiefs; ear muffs; headwear; hosiery; pantyhose; ankle socks; gloves; belts; belts for clothing; suspenders; leather belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Design of advertising for others; design of the advertising content of magazines for others; design of internet advertising; production of advertising matter and commercials; advertising agencies; dissemination of advertising matter; distribution of advertisements and commercial announcements; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; goods import-export agencies; quotation, tendering and distribution of products of domestic and foreign manufacturers; provision of commercial information; retail department stores; mail order services featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods of others; providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; computerized on-line ordering featuring general consumer merchandise; wholesale and retail store services featuring clothing; wholesale and retail store services featuring eyeglasses; wholesale and retail store services featuring fabrics; wholesale and retail store services featuring apparel accessories; wholesale and retail store services featuring shoes; wholesale and retail store services featuring leather products; wholesale and retail store services featuring indoor fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |