USPTO serial 87825455
ARCATECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCATECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fairfield, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene S. Winter
GENE S. WINTER ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for accessing, creating and downloading building specifications for architects, builders, engineers and persons who create building and project specifications; computer application software for accessing and downloading building product information for architects, builders, engineers and persons who create building and project specifications and designs; computer application software for accessing and downloading building product CAD and object files for architects, builders, engineers and persons who create building and project specifications and designs; computer application software for creating architectural design projects, assigning tasks, sharing and collaborating | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Periodic publication, namely, catalog featuring building products information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider featuring software for accessing, creating and downloading building specifications, building product information and CAD and object files for building products, for architects, builders, engineers and persons who create building and project specifications; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for accessing, creating and downloading building specifications, building product information and cad and object files for building products for architects, builders, engineers and persons who create building and project specifications; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for creating architectural design projects, assigning tasks, sharing and collaborating; online specification support services for use in architectural design and engineering, namely, providing a website featuring images, data and text for use in building information modeling; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for providing downloadable specifications for builders, namely, engineers and specifiers, and architects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |