USPTO serial 87852431
SITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nyall Engfield
NYALL ENGFIELD TRADEMARKRAFT500 WESTOVER DRSUITE 12298SANFORD, NC 27330Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases for mobile phones; Cases for smartphones; Cases for telephones; Chargers for batteries; Chargers for electric batteries; Chargers for electronic cigarettes; Dashboard cameras; GPS data logger for recording trips and classifying them into different accounts; GPS navigation device; GPS tracking device to be worn on the wrist of an athlete during endurance events; Keyboards for mobile phones; Keyboards for smartphones; Radar detectors; Radar guns for police work; Radar guns for sporting events; Radar jamming apparatus; Radar receivers with amplifiers; Audio equipment for vehicles, namely, loud speakers for automotive audio systems; Batteries and battery chargers; Batteries and battery chargers for intravenous fluid delivery apparatus; Battery chargers; Battery chargers for laptop computers; Battery chargers for mobile phones; Battery chargers for tablet computers; Battery chargers for use with telephones; Camera cases; Carrying cases for mobile computers; Cell phone battery chargers; Cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; Computer cases; Computer keyboards; Computer mice; Computer mouse; Computer mouse in the nature of a trackpad; Computer mouse, namely, touchpads; Computer mouse, namely, trackballs; Electronic devices for animal locating and tracking programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular communications; Global positioning system (GPS); Hardware and software adapter for coupling a GPS receiver to the microphone input of a digital camcorder; Protective carrying cases specially adapted for global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; Satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system (GPS); Vehicle mounted GPS sensor for determining the rate of motion for a vehicle; Wireless chargers | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |