Drawing for LAMBDA SCHOOL

USPTO serial 87942294

LAMBDA SCHOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAMBDA SCHOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman & Betsy Wang Lee

Beth M. Goldman & Betsy Wang Lee Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main St., Suite 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIrvine, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing on-line classroom instruction in the field of software development and machine learning; Providing education courses in the field of software development and machine learning offered through online, non-downloadable videos and instructor assistanceACTIVEJul 30, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2021MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 12, 2021ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 9, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jul 6, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 4, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 22, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
May 20, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 20, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 20, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 4, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 14, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 14, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 4, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance