USPTO serial 87976598
HARLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
CHENNAI TAMIL NADU, IN
CHENNAI TAMIL NADU, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hoisington,
Michael J. Hoisington, HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK401 W A ST SUITE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-7910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Plush toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ChuChu TV Studios
- Other trademarks owned by ChuChu TV Studios
- Other trademarks owned by ChuChu TV Studios
- Other trademarks owned by ChuChu TV Studios
- Other trademarks owned by CHUCHU TV STUDIOS, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by CHUCHU TV STUDIOS, LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named HARLO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| May 3, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |