USPTO serial 87977707
BADWATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BADWATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Klosowski
BEN KLOSOWSKI THRIVE IP(R)5401 NETHERBY LANESUITE 1201NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29420Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry chains; Jewelry charms; Jewelry stickpins; Bracelets; Charms for jewelry; Costume jewelry; Identification bracelets; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Rings | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2018 |
| 024 | Flags of textile or plastic; Banners and flags of textile; Brocade flags; Cloth flags; Fabric flags; Nylon flags; Plastic flags; Plastic pennants | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |