USPTO serial 87980076
TAKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANDERSON, DANIELLE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PATTERSON, CA
PATTERSON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P Eddy
Michael P Eddy LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL P EDDY12526 HIGH BLUFF DRIVESUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and advisory services in the field of energy efficiency; Business management consultation in the field of IoT technology, information, energy usage and mechanical analysis; Business management of air and water processing systems and facilities for others; Business project management services for construction projects; Consulting services in the field of energy usage management and energy efficiency; Energy usage management; Industrial management assistance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer project management services; Design and development of computer hardware; Design and development of hardware for internet of things systems; Providing planning and engineering service in the field of information and communications networks; Software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in the field of internet of things with specific regard to custom-designed and developed interfaces for the purpose of overall asset health monitoring; Tool management systems design services; maintenance and updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |