Drawing for SMART GREENS

USPTO serial 88023682

SMART GREENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART GREENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam D. Trudell

Miriam D. Trudell SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh arugula; Fresh herbs; Fresh kale; Fresh lettuce; Fresh spinach; Fresh vegetables; Unprocessed bok choy; all the foregoing excluding potatoes, beets, corn, tomatoes, wheat, soybeans, winter rape, carnations, chrysanthemums, and rough bluegrassACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 22, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance