USPTO serial 88043118
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Town of Mont-Royal, QC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT W. SMILIE
SCOTT W. SMILIE PATZIK, FRANK & SAMOTNY LTD.200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cookware, namely, pots, pans, roasting pans, steamers, skillets, non-electric griddles, woks; Cooking utensils, namely, grills, grill covers, cooking graters, wire baskets, sieves, spatulas, strainers, turners, rolling pins, whisks, skimmers, kitchen tongs, cooking forks, splatter screens, kitchen ladles, basting spoons, and knife blocks; Kitchen tools and accessories, namely, cookie jars, carafes, mixing bowls, chopping boards for kitchen use, potato mashers, cooking spoons, serving spoons, mixing spoons, slotted spoons, garlic presses, napkin holders not of metal, coaster sets not made of paper or textile, salad bowl sets, salad spinners, gravy boats, hand-operated salt and pepper mills, spice racks and ice cream scoops | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring cookware, bakeware, cooking utensils, kitchen tools and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |