USPTO serial 88048091
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. Bacall
Charles P. Bacall Verrill Dana, LLPOne Portland SquarePortland, ME 04101-4054UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Tobacco substitutes derived from lawful sources; tobacco substitutes not for medical purposes derived from lawful sources; flavorings for tobacco substitutes, other than essential oils, derived from lawful sources; herbs for smoking derived from lawful sources; cigarettes containing tobacco substitutes derived from lawful sources, not for medical purposes; electronic cigarette liquid comprised of flavorings in liquid form derived from lawful sources, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; flavorings derived from lawful sources, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; electronic cigarettes; electronic smoking pipes; electronic cigarettes for use as an alternative to traditional cigarettes; electric vaporizers, namely, smokeless vaporizer pipes for the ingestion and inhalation of tobacco and other herbal matter derived from lawful sources; oral vaporizers for smokers; tobacco pipes; matches, lighters for lighting cigarettes containing tobacco, tobacco substitutes and herbal materials derived from lawful sources, and papers for rolling cigarettes containing tobacco, tobacco substitutes and herbal materials derived from lawful sources; none of the foregoing containing, consisting of or marketed or intended for use with cannabis or cannabis extracts or derivatives with a THC concentration of more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |