USPTO serial 88072088
UNO PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNO PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, Québec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender
Philip R. Zender Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP275 Battery Street, Suite 2600San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms for mobile devices and for the world wide web for use by software developers in the creation, development and operation of software applications; software development tools for software developers for the creation of applications for mobile devices and for the world wide web | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |