Drawing for QRQUBE

USPTO serial 88072554

QRQUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QRQUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Heisey

David E. Heisey Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92130-2006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enrollment, verification, authentication of identity, in the biometric authentication and identification fieldsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, computer programming and software design for others in the fields of biometric recognition for computer, server, e-commerce, security, and identification fields; computer database design services for others; consulting services in the field of installation, maintenance and repair or computer software for computer systems for biometric identification and authentication; consulting services in the fields of the design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for biometric identification and authentication; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems, server problems, and maintenance of computer software for biometric recognition, for electronic business transactions for e-commerce, for authentication security, for authentication and access to a computer, for authentication and access to a server, and for biometric authentication; computer modeling services in the field of security and identity authenticationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance