USPTO serial 88090409
ALLERGEEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLERGEEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington Depot, CT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Homeopathic pharmaceuticals for use in the treatment of allergy symptoms; Medicated candies for the treatment of allergy symptoms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |