Drawing for ESQUIRE INSIGHTS

USPTO serial 88248854

ESQUIRE INSIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESQUIRE INSIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ariel E. Ronneburger

Ariel E. Ronneburger CULLEN AND DYKMAN LLP100 QUENTIN ROOSEVELT BOULEVARDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for use by law firms to calculate potential loan affordability, value of case inventory, quality of case data, and cash flow projectionsACTIVE—
036Financial services for law firms, namely, financial planning about loan affordability, financial assessment of cash flow projections, financial valuation of case inventories, and financial research and analysis about the quality of case dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 7, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance