Drawing for VISTA-EDGE

USPTO serial 88344793

VISTA-EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, BRITTANY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISTA-EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret C. McHugh

Margaret C. McHugh Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, STE 2800M/S: IP Docketing - 22Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and downloadable software consisting of a proximity sensor; LIDAR apparatus in the nature of a LIDAR sensor; micro-computer for geospatial data processing visualization, manipulation and integration of geographic information with downloadable graphical user interface; Computer hardware and downloadable software for obstacle detection and avoidance in autonomous vehicles, namely, interpreting data outputs from LASER and LIDAR detection sensors, communication with onboard and remote computer systems, identification of obstacles, algorithm to dynamically change autonomous vehicle path to avoid obstacles, algorithm to calculate and send see-and-stop command to autonomous vehicles; laser object detectors for use on vehicles; Lasers for measuring purposes; lidar apparatus; proximity sensors; electronic proximity sensors and switches; measuring apparatus, namely, laser distance metersACTIVE—
037Repair and maintenance of computer hardwareACTIVE—
042Providing technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software issues; providing repair and maintenance support services for computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance