USPTO serial 88345466
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and television programmes provided via a video-on-demand service; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Internet broadcasting services; Subscription television broadcasting; Transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; Video streaming services via the Internet, featuring independent films and movies; Video-on-demand transmission; Video-on-demand transmission services via the Internet | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |